Monday, May 24, 2010

Feeling LOST....

Wow!  The highly anticipated series finale of LOST is over and the heated discussions have begun.  You have to expect a big division of opinion on something like this, though.  After the build up of six long seasons, there is no way that anyone could satisfy everybody with the resolutions.  Let me begin by stating that I realize this is a television show and that over-analyzing it is a bit silly.  I should also add that this post will contain spoilers.  Having said that, let's move on...

It began with a plane crash.  Survivors stranded on a strange island with little hope for rescue (according to the pilot, who didn't last long, they were nearly 1000 miles off course).  Everyone quickly turns to Jack Shephard, a doctor, for leadership and he does his best to get them home.  Through a series of flashbacks we learn about the main characters and what they were facing in their lives before the plane crash.  Some characters came and went, most notably Walt (a boy with some interesting abilities).

This is probably the first of the storylines that did not have a clear resolution.  The viewer got the impression that Walt was intended for something more, but for unknown reasons, the writers let him leave the island without much follow up (we see him in a couple of visions and a "flash forward" but that's it).  His father, Michael, however does show back up to try to atone for some of his mistakes.

Another character that was developed and let go was Mr. Echo.  A man with a violent past, he also attempts to make up for his past transgressions by helping the survivors, fighting The Others and facing down the Smoke Monster.  His character is killed off and almost never mentioned again.

Along the way we learn a little more about the mysterious island, The Others that inhabit it, the DHARMA initiative, Jacob and the Man In Black/Smoke Monster.  There is time-travel, the metaphysical, forces of good and evil, drama, action and mystery.

So how does this all come together?  Well some say, not very well.  Let's take a look.  The final season is the one where we really start to see some questions answered, in a fashion.  First, what is the island?  What is its purpose?  According to Jacob, the island is a stop-gap for a gateway to "hell".  He has been protecting the island for generations and keeping the "cork in the bottle" to use his analogy.  His brother is the Man In Black who we later learn is the Smoke Monster.

Which leads us to the next question.  What/who is the Smoke Monster?  Unfortunately, he is never given a name.  His motivation is to leave the island, no matter the method or consequences.  Jacob, through a momentary lack of judgement, is actually responsible for MIB's transformation into the Smoke Monster, after which MIB can take on the form of anyone who as died or is dead on the island.  This becomes very important to his plans toward the end.  This is because the two brothers, through a mysterious set of rules are not allowed to harm one another.  MIB vowes to find a loophole which will allow him to kill Jacob and leave the island.

Next, The Candidates.  Jacob is seen through flashbacks interacting with the main characters in earlier times of their lives.  He speaks to them and touches them in turn, which supposedly protects them and sets things in motion that will lead them to the island.  The purpose of this is so that one of them can replace Jacob as the protector of the island as he knows his time is almost up.  MIB is not allowed to kill any of The Candidates himself.  He finds his loophole when John Locke's dead body is returned to the island.  MIB can now take on the persona of Locke, a former candidate, thereby circumventing some of the rules.  He is able to manipulate the character of Benjamin Linus and the two of them kill Jacob (though Jacob is able to hang around a little longer in "spirit" form to pass the torch... more on this later).

At one point, Jack is able to leave the island with some of The Candidates.  They go back to their old lives for three years but come to realize, for various reasons, that they need to find a way to return to the island.  During this time the other survivors have been transported to 1974 and are forced to join the DHARMA initiative.  This is a group that have come to the island to study its unique properties and try to live in a "utopian" type of community.  For these characters, three years also pass.

When they are re-united, it is in 1977 and physics genius Daniel Faraday has an idea about how to change the timeline and effectively negate the plane crash and the hardships that followed for the survivors.  He wants to detonate a hydrogen bomb  near the source of the island's power in hopes of neutralizing it.  Evidently the island was a post World War II bomb test facility and they happen to have an un-detonated bomb at their disposal.  This plan appears not to succeed and we lose some characters in the process.

This is where we begin to see what appears to be a parallel timeline.  I think this may be the sticking point for a lot of people as it turns out to be something completely different.  In this reality, the island and Jacob never existed.  The characters land at LA X  safely but their lives appear to be just a little different.  Eventually the characters in this existence come together and realize that they know each other and "remember" their time together on the island.  More on this in a bit...

Meanwhile, back at the island, the characters have to deal with the aftermath of the failed bomb attempt.  After some more hardship and some soul searching by the survivors, "dead" Jacob brings the remaining Candidates together to explain his search for a replacement and what the island represents.  Jack volunteers and Jacob performs a short ritual which makes Jack "like him"(presumably immortal).  This is Jacob's swan song and the survivors agree that Locke/MIB/Smoke Monster needs to be stopped.

Everyone ends up at the "heart of the island" and it's main source of power.  Jack and Locke agree to extinguish its light as they both think it will serve their separate purposes.  They utilize the character of Desmond as he is evidently immune to the intense electromagnetic properties of the islands power.  Desmond succeeds in neutralizing the power but with disastrous effects.  Earthquakes begin to shake the island and Locke runs for his getaway ship.  We find that Locke/MIB/Smoke Monster and Jack are no longer immortal and they proceed to begin a fight to the death.  Locke loses and he is now no longer a threat to the island.  However, Jack is severly wounded and faced with the realization that he has to re-ignite the power source or the island will be destroyed and, possibly, the rest of the world.

In the mean time, the rest of the characters, minus Hurley and Benjamin Linus (who decide to stay with Jack), race to a downed plane that has been repaired and is ready to leave.  They all board the plane and manage to take off just as the runway crumbles beneath them.  Six people manage to escape on the plane.

Jack finds a way to save the island but he is critically wounded and does not expect to survive.  He passes the guardianship of the island to Hurley who asks Ben Linus for help.  Desmond also survives.
Jack wanders out to the spot where he first awoke on the island back when it all began.  He lays down and dies.

In the alternate reality we find that all of the characters have gathered in a church.  Jack is there as well as his father, who had passed away.  We find that this reality is a type of "pocket purgatory" (I came up with that myself) and that they have created this place themselves so that they could experience a life without the island and re-unite before they move on....

This in no way cancels out the experiences that were had on the island nor is it a "Dallas-type" dream sequence.  The events on the island happened in "reality" and Hurley moves forward as its' protector for who knows how many years.  The characters who were able to leave on the plane move forward with their lives from there, but that is all a different story...?

Are all of the questions answered?  No.  It would be impossible to address the specifics of all the storylines raised.  This was a big undertaking with an epic feel to it.  We do not know the answers to all of the metaphysical, quasi-religious themes.  But then, we do not know these in real-life either.  Whether you like the ending or not; whether you found it satisfying or it left you wanting more; it was smart, thought provoking television (something that is sorely lacking these days).  And, it was one hell of a ride....

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Don't Mess With the Crazy Heart.....

I recently screened 2 movies on video.  The newly released Crazy Heart and the Adam Sandler comedy You Don't Mess With the Zohan.  As you can see, I don't necessarily watch movies in any particular order.... just whenever I get around to it.  Keeps people guessing.... Let's begin with the new, and much more respectable, Crazy Heart.
Starring Jeff Bridges (who won the Academy Award for his performance) and Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart is the story of an all but washed-up country singer and his attempt to come back from the brink of obscurity and alcoholism.  Bridges as "Bad Blake" is perfect for the role and well deserving of the Oscar.  You really believe that he is the character.  He's kind of reminiscent of Kris Kristofferson's character in A Star is Born and looks quite a bit like modern day Kris in some scenes.  Coincidentally, Bridges and Kristofferson are good friends and they reportedly had a good laugh about the similarities.  Bridges performs all the original songs himself and does a pretty good job.  The story is solid and has great character development for the most part, but they were a little lite on Gyllenhaal's motivations (then again it wasn't about her).  The movie ran just a bit longer than it needed but, overall, the pacing was good.  I recommend this one for anyone seeking a lite drama.

Next, Adam Sandler's You Don't Mess With The Zohan.  Sandler tends to do one of these stinkers every other film... One good mainstream movie, one silly, etc.  Zohan is not without merit.  It has some genuinely funny moments and his supporting cast that includes John Tuturro and, of course, Rob Schneider are good.  However, in the "it's so stupid it's funny" category, this one leaned a little bit more on the stupid side.  Sandler got all of his friends together to make another movie (under his own production company, Happy Madison) and they just wanted to poke a little fun at the terrorism paranoia and the racial stereotypes that go along with it.  I think he succeeded but you have to wade through all the sexual innuendo and crotch jokes first.  There are too many cameos to mention here, suffice it to say there seems to be one in about every scene!  All-in-all it's a fun way to waste about 90 minutes if you so choose...

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Iron Clad Sequel...

Iron Man 2 opened Friday to an enthusiastic movie-going public.  Kicking off the summer blockbuster season, the movie managed to pull down over $128 million in its opening weekend (5th highest opening ever).  With an all-star cast and non-stop action, the movie manages to capture the fun of the original without becoming stale.
Actor roll call:

Robert Downey Jr.
(Tony Stark / Iron Man)
Samuel L. Jackson
(Nick Fury)
Gwyneth Paltrow
(Pepper Potts)
Scarlett Johansson
(Natalie Rushman/Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow)
Sam Rockwell
(Justin Hammer)
Mickey Rourke
(Ivan Vanko / Whiplash)
Don Cheadle
(Lt. Col. James "Rhodey" Rhodes / War Machine)
Jon Favreau
(Happy Hogan)
Garry Shandling
(Senator Stern)

The action picks up 6 months after the events of the first movie.  All of the fall-out from Tony Stark revealing he is Iron Man is catching up with him, as well as the side-effects of having a small nuclear reactor in his chest!  Enemies and competitors are chomping at the bit to take Stark down while he tries to deal with it all.  Favreau, again, directs and writes himself a bigger role in front of the camera too (come to think of it, most of his scenes are with Scarlett Johansson.... way to go Jon!).

While maybe not having the depth and character development of the original, IM2 delivers top-notch acting and a good story.  There's a lot going on here because Favreau is trying to keep things running smooth within the Marvel Comics universe.  They want to make their current crop of movies cohesive so that they will line up and come together in The Avengers, slated for summer 2012.  Iron Man began the story, so to speak, and evidence in IM2 suggests that its events coincide with the what happened in The Incredible Hulk movie (the Edward Norton version, not Ang Lee).  Thor and Captain America are set to debut next summer.  All of these characters are expected to come together in said Avengers movie.  That said, be sure to stay after the credits again this time for a "secret scene".

All-in-all a great summer movie for the minions.....